Search (2 products)

Color

Vintage

Volume

Vinous AG rating

97 - 97
1965

Vintage & Style
1965 was a weak vintage, cold and rainy, with insufficient ripening. The summer was wet and lacked sunshine. Reds are thin, acidic, often disjointed. Whites lack brilliance and structure. Overall, it was a failed year with very few wines of interest, except for a handful of rare exceptions.

By Region
Burgundy: thin reds, diluted ...

Vintage & Style
1965 was a weak vintage, cold and rainy, with insufficient ripening. The summer was wet and lacked sunshine. Reds are thin, acidic, often disjointed. Whites lack brilliance and structure. Overall, it was a failed year with very few wines of interest, except for a handful of rare exceptions.

By Region
Burgundy: thin reds, diluted whites
Bordeaux: weak, green tannins
Rhône Valley: dull both north and south
Loire: green reds, flat whites
Alsace: unbalanced
Champagne: acidic, lacks dimension

To Know
1965 is one of the weakest vintages of the decade. Best avoided, except for a few survivors from top terroirs with careful élevage.

Signature
1965 expresses climatic failure: hollow, fading wines without depth or lasting identity.

More

1965There are 2 products.

Vintage & Style
1965 was a weak vintage, cold and rainy, with insufficient ripening. The summer was wet and lacked sunshine. Reds are thin, acidic, often disjointed. Whites lack brilliance and structure. Overall, it was a failed year with very few wines of interest, except for a handful of rare exceptions.

By Region
Burgundy: thin reds, diluted whites
Bordeaux: weak, green tannins
Rhône Valley: dull both north and south
Loire: green reds, flat whites
Alsace: unbalanced
Champagne: acidic, lacks dimension

To Know
1965 is one of the weakest vintages of the decade. Best avoided, except for a few survivors from top terroirs with careful élevage.

Signature
1965 expresses climatic failure: hollow, fading wines without depth or lasting identity.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 items
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 items